Biden administration defying logic on the southern border.

0:00 Speaker 1 Will Is Today is Janine Piro, a former.

0:05 Speaker 2 Okay prosecutor and judge.

0:08 Speaker 1 Okay wi Is Today is Jeanine Piro, a former prosecutor, a judge, and a TV host and a radio host on WABC Radio and she’ll be on every Sunday at eleven o’clock. Janine Piro, Judge the Department. I think the American people are starting to doubt the validity of the Department of Justice. I mean, I hate to say that.

0:38 Speaker 2 Well, you hate to say it. I spent thirty years in the trenches as a prosecutor, a judge, and a DA I was a believer. I mean, I believe in the justice system. I believe in truth, justice in the American way. So no one is more devastated by what we’re seeing in America today than people like me who

0:58 have fought the good far and it made sure that justice was meted out in an even handed manner. But what is happening in America today? And I don’t think people are just finding it out. I think people have felt it instinctively, but it has been confirmed and reconfirmed, you know, with and it shouldn’t matter what part of

1:20 the political spectrum you’re on. But it’s it’s pretty pretty clear that you know, if you are a Democrat, that you’re going to get away with whatever you need to get away with, even if you would make your crime, as Hillary Clinton did in the Durham Report. They came out and said she made up the dossier, that fake

1:40 dossier that you know, the former president Barack Obama who was a president at the time, and Vice President Joe Biden. She told them that she had to make up this dossier to get the press off her back with the email scandal and the FBI, the Department of Justice took that faked and split this country apart for four years.

2:03 I mean, the haters, oh my god, Donald Trump, he’s the pro putin. He’s a Putin asset, Russian asset. And then what we see is we’ve got a sitting president who’s got classified documents from when he was a senator, where it is a crime to take any documents out of the skiff, which obviously is a sensitive room where

2:27 you can’t take anything out, you can’t send send any messages. He’s got those documents from when he was a senator. I mean, that’s pretty clear cut. And I’ll tell you but now.

2:38 Speaker 1 I think the defense has been it’s pasted the statue of limitations. Let me tell you something.

2:45 Speaker 2 Let me tell you something, John, and I don’t mean to interrupt you, but no discussion. If the FBI knew about it and purposely did nothing about it, as far as I’m concerned, the statute of limitations is told t O L L E. D. If they if they intentionally did nothing, they knew about it, and they dug their

3:07 heels in and said we’re not going after them, then as far as I’m concerned, they’re part of the fraud. And the statute of limitations when it comes to fraud is when you find out about it. So, you know, let’s stup with this tamby horse crap.

3:20 Speaker 1 Now, let me ask you a question. I verbally said it on w a BC that if something is not right and they have that if the Department of Justice people people at the Department of Justice, if they have undue influence of something wrong with the FBI, then I think Christopher Ray has the obligation to stand up and

3:44 say enough is enough, this is wrong and you should not be directing the FBI to do X, Y and Z.

3:54 Speaker 2 First of all, do you think Christopher Ray has the intestinal fortitude to do that. Christopher Ray, I’m not he appeared. I’m telling you he doesn’t. The first time he appeared before Congress, and Congress was asking in their oversight authority for certain documents as well, you know, we can’t give it.

4:12 And this is years ago and right now with that ten twenty three, the most damaging document around Christopher Ray was not handed over to Congress, which has congressional oversight constitutional oversight over the Department of Justice and the FBI.

4:29 It wasn’t until they threatened him contempt he made a decision to hand over at ten twenty three. Who were acted, of course, but that ten twenty three wasn’t even classified. But what was in the ten twenty two, John, What was in that ten twenty three is not only to claim by a verified, confirmed, paid for FBI agent, FBI informant,

4:50 I should say, who had been proven truthful over and over again, that a president of a company, probably Barisma, was g being Joe Biden and Hunter Biden five million dollars each to make sure that Parisma could do work in the United States. And then the same document is the one that said he’s got tapes. Now be that

5:11 this is a document the FBI didn’t want to hand over. Christopher Ray. Instead of fighting with Congress and refusing to hand over an unclassified document that they’re entitled to, you ought to be investigating that. You should be on time.

5:25 Speaker 1 Who’s gonna investigate it if Congress. If Congress investigates it, who prosecutes nobody?

5:34 Speaker 2 That’s the whole point. The Department of Justice is in the swamp. They’re in the possible So.

5:39 Speaker 1 We’re so we can’t do anything until there’s an.

5:43 Speaker 2 Election in four do anything at all. And I just want to say, I know this happened a few days ago, but that Hunter Biden nonsense plea. If you pay one point two million dollars in taxes, John cassibatit’s and you’re a billionaire and you know all about this stuff. How much do you think you got to make to pay

6:05 one point two million in taxes? Four or five million dollars? Right now? This is the year that they found that that document and the ten twenty three and the claim by the owner of Barisma that he gave five thousand, five million dollars to each of them. They would have to find the money. That Hunter a crack addict, sexed,

6:27 dirt bag. Where was he getting that money? He was getting that money from Ukraine. So why aren’t they charging him with being a foreign lobbyist like Paul Maniford who went to jail solitary confinement before he was even convicted.

6:43 Is why are we not finding out about the money laundry? How did we get that money from Ukraine? What money was he making? His family says, oh poor, he was drug addicted, damn writing wasn’t he was sucking money out of Ukraine, Russia and.

6:59 Speaker 1 All the other understood.

7:00 Speaker 2 Your father was a point man on energy.

7:03 Speaker 1 Judge Barrow understood. And the American people have to sort it out because it’s difficult to see where the heck we are right now. Tell us you’re going to be on today Sunday at eleven o’clock w ABC. What are you going to talk about?

7:21 Speaker 2 Well, you know what, I have got an excellent medical doctor who, as you may know, John, there have been something like three hundred and fifty medical articles and things, the well documented about how we were misled during COVID and I’m not interested, although of course I am, but in terms of where it came from, I think everybody

7:45 agrees it came from the Wuhan lab. But the issue that we’re going to be talking about is what was the evidence that caused them to come out with this vaccine. There is evidence that the vaccine, especially for Omni Korn, made it work for people. That’s why they were telling him to get it again and again. So I’ve got

8:04 doctor Peter McCullough who’s going to be on, and I’ve also got Frank Gafney who’s going to be on. With all of what’s going on in China right now and whether or not the United States is going to let Jijingping in they Taiwan in exchange for those chips that we so desperately need and you know, dollars to donuts.

8:24 I think China does it while Joe Biden is president because everyone knows he’s a weakling.

8:32 Speaker 1 Well, Jamy, Judge, Janine Piro, I’m looking forward to your eleven o’clock show besides, and we’ll catch up again real soon.

8:39 Speaker 2 Thank you so much, Thank you, John, Bye bye,