Alternative to President Biden's nomination

0:00 Speaker 1 What is today is Robert F. Kennedy Junior. And he’s a great environmentalist, a man that always cared about the people. I’ve known him for thirty forty years, probably longer. And mister Kennedy, tell us you’re running for a campaign for president of the United States. Your name recognition is way up there. You’ve already have a polling of twenty percent

0:28 or more. How’s the election going?

0:34 Speaker 2 Well, so far, so good, John, I mean, I’m having fun. I’m getting to, you know, talk to a lot of people that I haven’t been able to talk to because of this answorship in many years. And my family is happy, and you know, I feel peaceful and content and so and they as you’re saying that my polling numbers keep well,

1:00 I mean not so so far, so good.

1:03 Speaker 1 And if people asked you the difference between President Biden and yourself, besides your age difference, which you’re you’re much younger, how would you describe your differences on what you want to accomplish for the United States versus what President Biden wants?

1:28 Speaker 2 Yeah, I mean, I you know, I’ve known President Biden for forty years, almost as long as I’ve known you. He’s been He’s a very very close personal friend of my family’s and of me. I’ve had a wonderful relationship with him, and and I have a you know, in a congenial relationship. There’s three members of my family who

1:51 are working in his administration, and you know, our relationships are very close. But I have a fundamental differences from don’t I think his policy in expanding the war and pursuing the warrant Ukraine is misguided and extremely dangerous. We went in there on a humanitarian mission, we were told, and yet that mission has now changed a broader mission,

2:22 which is to degrade and exhaust the Russian army. This is what Defense Secretary Voyd aust confided publicly, and President Biden has said that it’s about regime change in Russia. Those are existential friends from Russia, that it’s simply cannot afford to lose this war, and we are playing the Ukraine in a geopolitical proxy war with the Russians that

2:54 has already killed more than three hundred thousand Ukrainians, the sixty percent on employment rate, the infrastructure of the country has been ruined, and the flower of Ukrainian youth are being sacrificed. In a energy political struggle. That is uh, you know, it’s that that is not being conducted properly.

3:18 We should be compromising. So that’s one of the issues. The other, my other, you know, mister Biden, is for censorship. I’m against it. The White House has actively we now know from the Twitter files, I’ve been trying to censor me, been ordering and pressuring the social media platforms to censor me and many many other people. Anybody who is who

3:44 dissents from some of his policies are are are censored. And that is not That’s something that has always been and it’s ethical to the Democratic Party. I don’t like the fact that our foreign policy is being dictated by me, as that we have become the farm the party of big corporations, the pharmaceutical companies in Wall Street, rather than

4:10 middle class Americans. And we have now a war being conducted against the middle class in this country. The lockdowns for which we’ve done nothing cost sixteen trillion dollars. War in Iraq, which is a neo con war. We got nothing for that. We left Iraq worse than we found it.

4:31 We killed more Iraqis than Sodom Hussey. We created isis we flooded Europe with two million refugees, that these stabilized democracy all over Europe, and the same people are back in the White House conducting the Iraq War. So, you know, those are some of the issues that I differ with him on. I feel like my country is being stolen

4:54 and my party is being stolen, and I feel like I need to speak out against that.

5:01 Speaker 1 Well, you know, Robert, you know, I was a Bill Clinton Democrat, and I agreed with like ninety percent of what Bill Clinton did and I admired him. And things are not the same way right now, and I’m concerned for our country. What’s going on in the borders is wrong, and the amount of drugs coming through the borders nobody’s

5:26 doing anything about. What say you about that?

5:30 Speaker 2 I say that we should have closed borders and that we should expand immigration. It’s not raises were insensitive to say that we need to close our border and have an orderly immigration policy. I would expand immigrated legal immigration this country. That’s orderly, that makes sense for our country.

5:54 But I would make sure also that our borders are impervious.

5:58 Speaker 1 Because right now, uh, you know, I was talking to somebody.

6:02 Speaker 2 And between the humanitarian crisis that we now have on the border. It’s cruel to the people who’ve been drawn up there a vis a crisis, yeah, by all these open door policies and you know, all the children who are being victimized because of this, as you say, the drugs that are coming across the the fentanil, et cetera.

6:26 We have a crisis, and we need to close our border. And we also need to understand the reason that all of these people are coming to the border is traced back the US policies in Central America, which have been you know, the virtually we’ve we’ve gone to war with every country except for Costa Rica. We have policies that

6:53 subjugate the poor, that put corporations, elevate corporate control of those countries, and you US multinationals and that are belligerent and punish the poor, would murder the poor with you know, with periodic wars in Guatemala and Salvador, Panama, et cetera.

7:13 The only country that we’ve never invaded in Central America is Costa Rica. And that’s the one group that you won’t see at the border. It’s not Costa Ricans who are coming. Is now the richest country in Central America per cabin on, the most stable government because we’ve never gone in there and invaded. I mean, we need to

7:32 change our policies toward Central and Latin America, make those policies humane based, help those countries, as my uncle tried to do with the Alliance for Progress and with US AID to build the middle class in those countries. So if they don’t feel the need to leave their family, leave their owns and endure these terrible journeys two thousands

7:57 of miles and uh and risk their lives and their children’s lives to flee to the United States.

8:04 Speaker 1 And so many of them are dying too. And you know, the other big item besides the border is a lot of are allies. Saudi Arabia has been our ally forever. All of a sudden they’re turning around against us and siding with Iran. And I think we’re losing Brazil. I think Argentina is going with the Chinese. I mean, why

8:28 are our allies, traditional allies for America for the last fifty years, seventy years, turning against us?

8:38 Speaker 2 Because we have a failed foreign policy John that’s based upon rejection of military power, and that is what the Nakhons brought to our country. I’m saying that we you know, we won the Cold War. This is Derek document, the Project for the American Centaury wolf Go with Romisfield Taorrian Neuland who is back in the White House dictating foreign policy.

9:04 Right now, we won the Cold War and now we deserve to have an American century. That’s since worced through force some arms in all the countries to establish American hegemony through military power across the globe. And it’s failed.

9:21 It’s a failed colossi. It’s a failed strategy. The Chinese have done exactly the opposite. The Chinese, instead of projecting military power, have projected economic power.

9:33 Speaker 1 And because the Chinese, the Chinese do not want a nuclear war, the Chinese do not want a fighting war, but they are kicking the crap out of us economically.

9:48 Speaker 2 Well, here’s what the Chinese did after nine to eleven, after the Iraq War, we went to warfare against Iraq preemptively for no reason. Or AC didn’t do anything us. We spent eight point one trillion dollars on this. That warrant is after a Yemen and Sudan, in Syria, in Lebanon, et cetera. And during the time that we spent eight

10:17 point one trillion dollars bombing bridges, bombing ports, bombing hospitals and homes, and the Chinese spent the exact same amount, eight point one trillion dollars building ports, building bridges, building airstrips, building rows in countries all over Africa, Latin American and Asia.

10:37 And as it turns out, that’s been a much better strategy. Our strategy in the Mid East was called the Shia Crescent. Saudi Arabia was the keystone, and then the Arab Emirates, the Aman, Qatar, Abu Dhabi and updrew Lebanon and Syria were supposed to be a Shia Cress and that would contain the expansion and the ambitions of Iran. What happened

11:08 a month ago is Saudi Arabia broker a deal between I mean, China broke the deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran. So our whole fil ODSVII, our whole military strategy, the entire American Empire collapsed because the Chinese money and used their economic power to build real friendships with these countries and real trust without strings attached. And the Saudi Arabians

11:36 came or Mohammed bin Solomon two weeks after that dropped oil production during an American inflationary spiral, which of course aggravates inflation in our country. The Saudis have never done that before. And a week after that, he explained his rationality, and we don’t care what the Americans think anymore. So it a trillion dollars a year into supporting these bases,

12:04 eight hundred bases around the world, trying to bribe with military weaponry, Sau the Arabian, all these countries, and the whole keystone of that strategy collapsed inside of one month in March. And that is the failure. And I’ll tell you something, John, When my uncle was president, he was surrounded by a military industrial complex, an intelligence apparatus that

12:31 was constantly trying to get him to go to war allows Vietnam, etcetera. He refused. He said that the job of an American president is to keep the nation out of war. He refused to send combat troops in the Atte.

12:44 Speaker 1 I agreed. I agreed with your uncle. I agreed. And let me ask you a question. I mean, I’ve never asked you this before. Who do you think really killed your uncle?

12:58 Speaker 2 Well, I think there’s overwhelm tell me evidence and that the CIA was involved in as a murder. I think it’s beyond a reasonable doubt at this point. People you know who question that, I’ll tell you the book. You know, a book that that probably distills the millions of documents of evidence, including confessions of people who are involved in

13:21 the crime and the and the six year cover up. The best kind of distillation of that is a book called The Unspeakable by Jim Douglas. And I’ve course read probably one hundred books on the subject.

13:35 Speaker 1 Let me ask you one more question. That is the best I’ve said publicly and on the radio that the same people that killed your your uncle killed Martin Luther King and killed your father.

13:53 Speaker 2 Well, in terms of my father’s death, in terms of my uncle’s death, the evidence is overwhelming that the CIA was involved in the murder and cover The evidence of the CIA involvement in my father’s dad is very convincing.

14:14 That is circumstantial. We do not have, you know, the really strong documentary and testimonial evidence that we have in my uncle Boe. The best, the best evidence suggests that my father was killed by Ugailor. Sir hansor And fired his shots. He fired eight shots, two of them toward my father. One of them hit Paul Schrade, who was

14:42 my father’s friend and the UAW leader. The second shot he fired at my father hit the door jam behind my father and was later removed from by the police. Sir and was then pounced upon by six men and bent over the steam table and his firing arm was directed away from my father, but ray for Johnson said

15:06 he had super human strength. They could not get the pistol away from him, so he emptied the barrel, he emptied the chamber. He fired six other shots, and all of those shots to hit people. So we know and we know what happened to all the shots.

15:28 Speaker 1 Robert I remember that day like yesterday.

15:34 Speaker 2 There were seventy seven eye witnesses. Sir Ann was always in front of my father. My father. The autopsy by Thomas Magucci shows was killed by four shots that were hit that hit him from behind. They were all contact shots.

15:50 The barrel of a nun was touching his skin or his clothes at the time the trader was pulled. Those shots were almost certainly fired by the security guard who was holding his elbow at the time and directing him towards the ambush. Towards Sir Han’s ambush. That man is called Eugene pain Caesar. He was an intelligence operative who

16:16 worked at the Lockheed plant and the Boweling plant, and had gotten the job as a security guard for my father three days earlier. He publicly made the statements that he hated the Kennedys. He particularly hated Robert Kennedy because he thought Robert Kennedy was going to turn the country over for the Blacks. This was his statement. He died

16:42 two years ago. I was in communication with him at the time, asking to come over to the Philippines where he fled afterwards, and by the way, he was seen by twelve eye witnesses with his gun out. He never denied it. He said that he pulled the shoot at Sir and when my father fell, he must have known

17:05 that he was being shot from behind, because he turned around and pulled off Sasar’s clip on tie and then he fell on top of Sailor. When Stayser got up, he was holding his gun, which was seen as I say, but it doesn’t win. But I was not confiscated by the l A p D. He later lied about what

17:29 he did with the gun and UH, and he changed his story repeatedly about why he got he had his gun out, and who he was firing at.

17:41 Speaker 1 Robert, I wanted to continue this discussion. We’re out of time, but I wanted to continuous discussion again in the future. And you know, what we’re talking about is about part of American history and keep fighting for America. I understand the difference differences between you and President Joe Biden, and we’ll continue our conversation. Thank you so much for coming

18:06 on this Sunday morning.

18:08 Speaker 2 Thanks for having us